Temporary Foreign Worker Program in Canada

return to the list of Cases

Introduction

Throughout history, human mobility has been a constant in response to changing environmental and economic pressures. Before the modern era, fluid, often cyclical, movement was a necessary part of life. Early human societies, from hunter-gatherers to agrarian communities, moved with the rhythms of nature. This mobility was essential for survival, allowing communities to follow game, find fertile land, or seek out new resources. In this pre-industrial world, borders as we know them were nonexistent, and people moved with relative freedom, a testament to a livelihood strategy rooted in adaptability.

This unhindered movement continued as early urban centers emerged. These cities became magnets for labour, attracting people who would come for short periods to work in construction, trade, or other nascent industries. This system provided a flexible workforce for urban economies, which could expand and contract with fluctuations in demand. For the individuals, this temporary work provided an opportunity for earning a living during peak seasons. The fluidity of this pre-modern labour mobility stands in stark contrast to the regulated systems of today.

The Modern State and Industrialization

The 1800s brought a profound shift in global labour migration. The consolidation of the modern nation-state introduced rigid, formal borders and governmental control over movement. The free, fluid movement of the past gave way to a new era defined by immigration laws and border regulations. This era marked a fundamental change, transforming human mobility from a natural process into a state-managed phenomenon.

Simultaneously, the Industrial Revolution reshaped labour demands on an unprecedented scale. As factories and new industries expanded, they required a steady and large workforce. Improvements in transportation and global trade networks facilitated the large-scale movement of people, transcending local and seasonal patterns. In response, states began to systematically manage these flows to meet the growing labour demands of industrial production. This period laid the critical foundation for the modern system of managed migration, where a person’s movement is regulated and controlled.

Seasonal versus Temporary Labour

While the terms are often used interchangeably, it is important to understand the distinctions between seasonal and temporary labour migration in modern contexts.

Seasonal labour migration is explicitly tied to predictable, cyclical events. This form of migration is most common in sectors like agriculture, where workers are needed for planting and harvesting seasons, and in tourism, which sees a surge during peak holiday periods. These movements are predictable and are typically brief, with workers returning to their home countries once the season concludes.

In contrast, temporary labour migration is a broader category of fixed-term employment that is not limited to natural or predictable cycles. These contracts can last anywhere from a few months to several years. Workers in this category may fill roles in a wide variety of sectors, including healthcare, domestic services, and advanced manufacturing. While these contracts have a fixed end date, they can often be extended, offering a flexible solution for labour needs that are not seasonal. This form of migration reflects the highly specialized and evolving demands of the global economy.

Seasonal and Temporary Labour in the Global Era

In the modern era, temporary and seasonal labour migration has introduced a set of complex and systemic challenges that affect both the workers and their host countries. A central issue is the discrepancy between the legal status of workers and the reality of their lives. Many migrant workers are classified under temporary or seasonal visa programs, yet they often remain in their host countries for extended periods. This is frequently facilitated by repeated short-term contracts, which create a form of circular migration. This cycle of short-term work often masks what is, in practice, a long-term or even permanent reliance on migrant labour, trapping individuals in a state of perpetual instability. Rather than providing a one-time opportunity, this system undermines the workers' ability to establish long-term economic security or build a stable life.

Tiered Systems and Social Consequences

Despite the stated principles of equity and fairness, the reliance on these visa programs often creates a tiered society. Different visa categories and regulatory schemes effectively obscure the ongoing and often permanent nature of migrant labour. This creates a class of individuals who are granted a form of permanently temporary status. They contribute to the economy and society but are denied the full rights and protections afforded to permanent residents or citizens. This systemic arrangement creates a gap between a country's labour needs and its social policies, leading to a host of consequences, including wage depression in certain sectors, inadequate social integration, and a persistent vulnerability for migrant workers.

The Case of Canada

Industrialization in Canada during the late 1800s and early 1900s reshaped the nation’s economic landscape and labour dynamics. Rapid urban growth in centres like Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver spurred a shift in work patterns, as both rural seasonal employment and urban temporary work became essential to support expanding industries. This period saw the rise of a demand for labour that transcended local availability, setting the stage for more structured systems of managing worker mobility.

Over time, the Canadian government recognized the need to regulate and support these labour movements. This led to the creation of formal programs, such as the Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program (SAWP), which was introduced in 1966. SAWP institutionalized the temporary employment of foreign workers to meet seasonal demands in agriculture, marking a pivotal moment in Canada's approach to migrant labour. This, along with subsequent developments in temporary labour policies, helped shape a dual labour market where seasonal and temporary migrant workers continue to fill essential roles, a system that has since evolved into the larger Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP), a central component of Canada's modern labour strategy.

Canada's Temporary Migrant Worker Programs

The Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP) is Canada’s primary mechanism for addressing labour shortages by granting employers access to foreign labour. It operates on the principle that temporary foreign workers (TFWs) should be hired only when no Canadian citizens or permanent residents are available to perform the work. However, the program is not a single, unified entity but is strategically divided into distinct streams to align with the specific needs of different industries and labour market conditions. This structure attempts to balance the demand for labour with the protection of domestic workers and the rights of TFWs. 

The four main streams of the TFWP reflect a tiered system designed to differentiate between various types of work. The High-Wage Stream is intended for highly skilled and specialized roles, where employers must demonstrate that they have actively sought to hire Canadians first and that the position offers a wage at or above the provincial median. In contrast, the Low-Wage Stream addresses labour gaps in sectors with lower wages, such as food processing, hospitality, and retail. This stream includes more stringent requirements for employers, such as limits on the percentage of foreign workers they can hire and mandatory living and working condition assessments.

Beyond these general categories, the TFWP also includes specialized programs for the agricultural sector. The Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program (SAWP) is a long-standing, government-to-government agreement that allows for the controlled and regulated entry of foreign workers for specific, time-sensitive agricultural tasks like planting and harvesting. Complementing SAWP is the broader Agricultural Stream, which covers year-round agricultural jobs and positions that are not seasonal. Together, these programs form a comprehensive system that manages the flow of foreign workers into the Canadian economy, reflecting a complex interplay of economic necessity, policy, and social considerations.

Issues with the TFWP in the 2020s

The Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP) has been widely criticized for creating systemic vulnerabilities for migrant workers. A key issue is the closed work permit system, which ties a worker to a single employer. This arrangement gives employers significant power, as workers who face issues like unpaid wages or poor living conditions are often afraid to speak up for fear of losing their job and being deported. Human rights groups and parliamentary reports have highlighted that this lack of job mobility makes workers susceptible to exploitation.

Employers, too, face challenges with the program. The process of getting a Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA) and complying with complex rules can be costly and confusing, especially for small businesses. Some in the business community argue that these bureaucratic hurdles create an uneven playing field.

Additionally, Canada has not signed the UN Convention on Migrant Workers (CMW). While Canada maintains that its domestic laws protect these workers, this decision means the country is not subject to the international oversight mechanisms of the convention. The combination of restrictive work permits, administrative complexity, and a lack of international oversight leaves many temporary foreign workers in a precarious position.

Video

Immigration Minister of Canada discusses the federal government's decision to reduce the number of low-wage temporary foreign workers [20m 13s]

The federal government is set to limit the hiring of temporary foreign workers to no more than 10% of a company's total workforce. This decision has prompted criticism from business owners and migrant worker groups who argue that the changes will negatively impact small businesses, particularly in rural and remote communities, and that the government is treating migrant workers as "disposable". Immigration Minister Marc Miller explains that the changes are necessary to address the issue of depressing wages and ensure the economy is properly aligned, while also emphasizing the need to treat all workers with dignity and respect.

Discussion

1. How might experiencing a repetitive temporary work arrangement in a different country change your view of what home means?

2. Borders are a relatively recent human invention. What might society look like today if modern nation-states had never imposed them?

Critical Thinking

1. International Law: The text notes Canada has not signed the UN Convention on Migrant Workers. The government's stance is that domestic laws are sufficient. Critically evaluate this claim, using the provided text as a starting point. 

2. Policy Language: The text states the TFWP operates on the principle that temporary foreign workers (TFWs) should be hired only when no Canadian citizens or permanent residents are available."Analyze the term available. What does this term mean in a practical sense, considering factors like wages, working conditions, and geographic location? How does the government's definition of available shape the outcomes of the TFWP?

Further Investigation

1. Employers: Research the specifics of the Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA) process for employers. What are the costs, documentation requirements, and typical processing times? How do these factors shape an employer's decision-making?

2. Youth Unemployment and TFWP: Look into studies or reports that specifically analyze the relationship between the rise of the TFWP and youth unemployment rates in Canada. What are the key arguments and data points from both sides of the debate?

return to the list of Cases

contact  |  quotes  |  site map

© 2025 Serdar Kaya